[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a518d51-db04-ac56-fab8-5bc6be8f5b1c@web.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 19:40:28 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5.1] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration
documentation
>>>> …
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
>>>> …
>>>>> +If you think that kernel/init options become too long to write in boot-loader
>>>>> +configuration file or you want to comment on each option, the boot
>>>>> +configuration may be suitable. …
>>>>
>>>> Would you like to specify any settings in the boot configuration file
>>>> because the provided storage capacity would be too limited by the kernel command line?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>
>> How will affected places be improved after such an agreement?
>
> Would you please make a patch of new sentence?
Not directly.
* If I would need to provide another wording alternative as a concrete patch,
I would have to wait until previously accepted changes would become available
in a Linux development repository.
* So I would find it easier to agree on wording variants during our current
development discussion from which you would present results as a subsequent patch.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists