[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2003061240480.181741@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:41:32 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] mm: Add PageLayzyFree() helper functions for
MADV_FREE
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > In general, I don't think this patch really improves the situation ...
> > it's only a handful of places where this change slightly makes the code
> > easier to understand. And there, only slightly ... I'd prefer better
> > comments instead (e.g., in PageAnon()), documenting what it means for a
> > anon page to either have PageSwapBacked() set or not.
>
> Personally, I still prefer the better named functions than the comments
> here and there. But I can understand that people may have different
> flavor.
>
Maybe add a comment to page-flags.h referring to what PageSwapBacked
indicates when PageAnon is true?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists