[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2003062148050.2990@felia>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 21:50:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@....de>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MAINTAINERS: adjust to trusted keys subsystem
creation
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:30:13PM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > Commit 47f9c2796891 ("KEYS: trusted: Create trusted keys subsystem")
> > renamed trusted.h to trusted_tpm.h in include/keys/, and moved trusted.c
> > to trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c in security/keys/.
> >
> > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains:
> >
> > warning: no file matches F: security/keys/trusted.c
> > warning: no file matches F: include/keys/trusted.h
> >
> > Rectify the KEYS-TRUSTED entry in MAINTAINERS now and ensure that all
> > files in security/keys/trusted-keys/ are identified as part of
> > KEYS-TRUSTED.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@....de>
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@....de>
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> > Changes to v1:
> > - use a global pattern for matching the whole security/keys/trusted-keys/
> > directory.
> > Changes to v2:
> > - name the correct directory in the commit message
> >
> > Sumit, please ack.
> > Jarkko, please pick this patch v3.
>
> Please tell me why you emphasize the moment when a patch that does not
> fix a critical bug is picked?
>
> Do you have systems that break because the MAINTAINERS file is not
> updated?
>
> It will end up in v5.7 PR for sure but saying things like that is same
> as saying that there would be some catastrophically urgent need to still
> squeeze the patch into v5.6. Unless you actually have something critical
> in your hand, please stop doing that.
>
Got it. I did not intend to emphasize any urgency; I will not continue
to do that for patches of this clean-up type.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists