[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200306033850.GO29971@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:38:50 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, aarcange@...hat.com,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com,
khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru, kirill@...temov.name,
kravetz@...ibm.com, mhocko@...nel.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
tj@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [failures] mm-vmscan-remove-unnecessary-lruvec-adding.patch
removed from -mm tree
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:32:18PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Mar 5, 2020, at 9:50 PM, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> > The patch titled
> > Subject: mm/vmscan: remove unnecessary lruvec adding
> > has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
> > mm-vmscan-remove-unnecessary-lruvec-adding.patch
> >
> > This patch was dropped because it had testing failures
>
> Andrew, do you have more information about this failure? I hit a bug
> here under memory pressure and am wondering if this is related
> which might save me some time digging…
See Hugh's message from a few minutes ago:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] per lruvec lru_lock for memcg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists