lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200305195317.771bd8fd1f308172d26a51fe@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:53:17 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [y2038] 412c53a680: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 11.7%
 improvement

On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:21:38 +0800 kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:

> FYI, we noticed a 11.7% improvement of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
> 
> 
> commit: 412c53a680a97cb1ae2c0ab60230e193bee86387 ("y2038: remove unused time32 interfaces")

That patch merely removed unused code!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ