[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVK62jqkLimdZWbLE2wgEAuVi5HdY231nR_wPj4TiMtX9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:38:57 +0800
From: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: convert mtk-quadspi binding doc for spi-mtk-nor
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 6:47 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 3. replace binding example with a mt7629 one because this is the
> > only one I know the interrupt assignment.
>
> That doesn't really matter. It would be less churn without that change
> and examples are just examples.
> [...]
> > -
> > - flash@0 {
> > - compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> > - reg = <0>;
> > - };
>
> Better to leave this in the example IMO.
>
> Rob
I'll revert example changes and add a dummy interrupt binding instead in v3.
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists