linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kernfs: kvmalloc xattr value instead of kmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58c6e6dafabea52e5b030d18b83c13e4f43ab8e3.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:49:51 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org
Cc:     shakeelb@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kernfs: kvmalloc xattr value instead of kmalloc

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 13:16 -0800, Daniel Xu wrote:
> It's not really necessary to have contiguous physical memory for xattr
> values. We no longer need to worry about higher order allocations
> failing with kvmalloc, especially because the xattr size limit is at
> 64K.

So why use vmalloc memory at all?

> diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c
']
> @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ struct simple_xattr *simple_xattr_alloc(const void *value, size_t size)
>  	if (len < sizeof(*new_xattr))
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	new_xattr = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	new_xattr = kvmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);

Why is this sensible?
vmalloc memory is a much more limited resource.

Also, it seems as if the function should set
new_xattr->name to NULL before the return.