[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58f4d6b3-ce3d-d1a5-aa0f-c31c1bbec091@web.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:34:30 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.1] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration
documentation
> If you think you have "any more" update candidates, feel free to make
> an update "patch" and send to us.
I pointed a few change possibilities out already.
> That will be the next step.
I got the impression that we are in the process of constructing another patch together
which will fix known wording weaknesses.
By the way:
I wonder about the shown version identifier.
Will the patch numbering need also further considerations?
>> …
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
>> …
>>> +If you think that kernel/init options become too long to write in boot-loader
>>> +configuration file or you want to comment on each option, the boot
>>> +configuration may be suitable. …
>>
>> Would you like to specify any settings in the boot configuration file
>> because the provided storage capacity would be too limited by the kernel command line?
>
> Yes.
How will affected places be improved after such an agreement?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists