linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Hyper-V commits for 5.6-rc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200306102904.625skxmfbne2zwbp@debian>
Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:29:04 +0000
From:   Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, kys@...rosoft.com,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, mikelley@...rosoft.com,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, haiyangz@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Hyper-V commits for 5.6-rc

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 12:28:48PM -0600, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:59 AM Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is mostly a "dry-run" attempt to sort out any wrinkles on my end.
> > If I have done something stupid, let me know.
> 
> Looks fine. I generally like seeing the commits being a bit older than
> these are - you seem to have applied or rebased them not all that long
> before sending the pull request. I prefer seeing that they've been in
> linux-next etc, but for soemthing small like this I guess it doesn't
> much matter. Next time?

Ack.

Those patches were applied not very long before sending the pull request
because I thought simple patches should be fine.

In the future I will let patches go in linux-next first.

Wei.