linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 16/27] tracing: Remove regular RCU context for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:31:35 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        luto@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, frederic@...nel.org,
        dan.carpenter@...cle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/27] tracing: Remove regular RCU context for
 _rcuidle tracepoints (again)

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 11:43:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:34:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Effectively revert commit 865e63b04e9b2 ("tracing: Add back in
> > rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson() for rcuidle tracepoints") now that we've
> > taught perf how to deal with not having an RCU context provided.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/tracepoint.h |    8 ++------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> > @@ -179,10 +179,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepo
> >  		 * For rcuidle callers, use srcu since sched-rcu	\
> >  		 * doesn't work from the idle path.			\
> >  		 */							\
> > -		if (rcuidle) {						\
> > +		if (rcuidle)						\
> >  			__idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu);\
> > -			rcu_irq_enter_irqsave();			\
> > -		}							\
> >  									\
> >  		it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_raw((tp)->funcs);		\
> >  									\
> > @@ -194,10 +192,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepo
> >  			} while ((++it_func_ptr)->func);		\
> >  		}							\
> >  									\
> > -		if (rcuidle) {						\
> > -			rcu_irq_exit_irqsave();				\
> > +		if (rcuidle)						\
> >  			srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, __idx);\
> > -		}							\
> >  									\
> >  		preempt_enable_notrace();				\
> >  	} while (0)
> 
> So what happens when BPF registers for these tracepoints? BPF very much
> wants RCU on AFAIU.

I suspect we needs something like this...

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index a2f15222f205..67a39dbce0ce 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -1475,11 +1475,13 @@ void bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp)
 static __always_inline
 void __bpf_trace_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 *args)
 {
+	int rcu_flags = trace_rcu_enter();
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	preempt_disable();
 	(void) BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, args);
 	preempt_enable();
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+	trace_rcu_exit(rcu_flags);
 }
 
 #define UNPACK(...)			__VA_ARGS__