lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:40:39 +0100 From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de> To: YunQiang Su <syq@...ian.org> Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@...ier.eu>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, libc-alpha@...rceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter * YunQiang Su: > AT_* only has 32 slot and now. I was afraid that maybe we shouldn't take one. > /* AT_* values 18 through 22 are reserved */ > 27,28,29,30 are not used now. > Which should we use? Where does this limit of 32 tags come from? I don't see it from a userspace perspective.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists