linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] MIPS: Replace setup_irq() by request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200306124755.GA10251@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:47:55 +0100
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@...il.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] MIPS: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 05:27:53PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
> request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq()
> occur after memory allocators are ready.
> 
> Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not
> ready by the time early interrupts were initialized.
> 
> Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq().
> 
> remove_irq() has been replaced by free_irq() as well.
> 
> There were build error's during previous version, couple of which was
> reported by kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> of which one was reported
> by Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> as well. There were a
> few more issues including build errors, those also have been fixed.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710191609480.1971@nanos
> 
> Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>

thank you, applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]