linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/22] dt-bindings: Permit platform devices in the trivial-devices bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:56:51 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] dt-bindings: Permit platform devices in the
 trivial-devices bindings

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:48 AM <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru> wrote:
>
> From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
>
> Indeed there are a log of trivial devices amongst platform controllers,
> IP-blocks, etc. If they satisfy the trivial devices bindings requirements
> like consisting of a compatible field, an address and possibly an interrupt
> line why not having them in the generic trivial-devices bindings file?

NAK.

Do you have some documentation on what a platform bus is? Last I
checked, that's a Linux thing.

If anything, we'd move toward getting rid of trivial-devices.yaml. For
example, I'd like to start defining the node name which wouldn't work
for trivial-devices.yaml unless we split by class.

Rob