[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH9NwWfgJvPDE4_gjMhKaRSxJm-yJkzxOSDbU-HaQkcHuTL76w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 14:58:30 +0100
From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: enable drm imx support
Hi
Sorry for the delay.. totally forgot about the mail.
Am Mi., 19. Feb. 2020 um 10:11 Uhr schrieb Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>:
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:48:23AM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> > Am Di., 18. Feb. 2020 um 10:14 Uhr schrieb Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 01:09:32PM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> > > > Am Mo., 17. Feb. 2020 um 05:19 Uhr schrieb Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 02:30:12PM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> > > > > > Am Mo., 10. Feb. 2020 um 11:58 Uhr schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > > > > > <krzk@...nel.org>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 11:54, Christian Gmeiner
> > > > > > > <christian.gmeiner@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Am Fr., 24. Jan. 2020 um 09:44 Uhr schrieb Christian Gmeiner
> > > > > > > > <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Makes it possible to multi v7 defconfig for stm32 and imx based devices with
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you mean by stm32 based devices here?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > CONFIG_ARCH_STM32 - I have a STM32MP157C-DK2 in my board farm and
> > > > would love to use
> > > > multi_v7 for imx6 and stm32.
> > >
> > > The patch is all about enabling drm-imx driver support. The commit log
> > > gives the impression that drm-imx driver also works on stm32 devices.
> > > Is that the case?
> > >
> >
> > No - the common thing both share is etnaviv.
>
> I did not know that before, and thanks for the information. But looking
> at the code change, there is nothing about etnaviv driver, and it's all
> about drm-imx driver. So I'm still questioning why stm32 needs to be
> mentioned in the commit log at all.
>
> > The patch subject "ARM:
> > multi_v7_defconfig: enable drm imx support" is fine
>
> Agreed. It's perfect.
>
> > I think but in the commit message I missed the verb so this should be
> > a better one:
> >
> > --->8---
> > ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: enable drm imx support
> >
> > Makes it possible to use multi v7 defconfig for stm32 and imx based devices with
> > full drm support.
> > --->8---
>
> I don't think 'stm32' should be there, as the code change in this commit
> has nothing to do with stm32, if I understand it correctly.
>
Okay.. what about:
--->8---
ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: enable drm imx support
It will be useful to have it enabled for KernelCI boot and runtime testing.
--->8---
> > How shall I proceed to get this change in?
>
> I can edit the commit log when applying. But we need to agree on what
> it should be first.
>
Great!
--
greets
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc
https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists