Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 15:21:23 +0100
From:   Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@...esys.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: ds2430: non functional fixes

Hi all,

sorry, no intention to be rude, i replied previously to greg
(email-bot message) only,
without including all, just a mistake.

Was just about asking what to do to fix the issue reported by the bot.

Regards,
Angelo

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 7:45 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> > Mainly discovered a typo in the eeprom size that may lead to
> > misunderstandings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@...esys.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2430.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2430.c b/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2430.c
> > index 6fb0563fb2ae..67d168ddfb60 100644
> > --- a/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2430.c
> > +++ b/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2430.c
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >  /*
> >   * w1_ds2430.c - w1 family 14 (DS2430) driver
> > - **
> > + *
> >   * Copyright (c) 2019 Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@...esys.com>
> >   *
> >   * Cloned and modified from ds2431
> > @@ -290,6 +290,6 @@ static struct w1_family w1_family_14 = {
> >  module_w1_family(w1_family_14);
> >
> >  MODULE_AUTHOR("Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@...esys.com>");
> > -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("w1 family 14 driver for DS2430, 256kb EEPROM");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("w1 family 14 driver for DS2430, 256b EEPROM");
> >  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >  MODULE_ALIAS("w1-family-" __stringify(W1_EEPROM_DS2430));
> > --
> > 2.25.0
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
> a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
> to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> kernel tree.
>
> You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> as indicated below:
>
> - Your patch did many different things all at once, making it difficult
>   to review.  All Linux kernel patches need to only do one thing at a
>   time.  If you need to do multiple things (such as clean up all coding
>   style issues in a file/driver), do it in a sequence of patches, each
>   one doing only one thing.  This will make it easier to review the
>   patches to ensure that they are correct, and to help alleviate any
>   merge issues that larger patches can cause.
>
> - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
>   possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
>   section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
>   Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to
>   properly describe the change.
>
> - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
>   and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
>   the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
>   Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should
>   look like.
>
> If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> from other developers.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h's patch email bot



-- 
Angelo Dureghello
Timesys
e. angelo.dureghello@...esys.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists