[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82b7d2d8c75e4c80a7704ae43940392a@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 02:05:40 +0000
From: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"sean.j.christopherson@...el.com" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: small optimization for is_mtrr_mask calculation
Hi,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>On 05/03/20 03:48, linmiaohe wrote:
>> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>>
>> We can get is_mtrr_mask by calculating (msr - 0x200) % 2 directly.
>> index = (msr - 0x200) / 2;
>> - is_mtrr_mask = msr - 0x200 - 2 * index;
>> + is_mtrr_mask = (msr - 0x200) % 2;
>> if (!is_mtrr_mask)
>> *pdata = vcpu->arch.mtrr_state.var_ranges[index].base;
>> else
>>
>
>If you're going to do that, might as well use ">> 1" for index instead of "/ 2", and "msr & 1" for is_mtrr_mask.
>
Many thanks for suggestion. What do you mean is like this ?
index = (msr - 0x200) >> 1;
is_mtrr_mask = msr & 1;
Thanks again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists