[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200306153446.GC8590@lenoir>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:34:47 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Alex Belits <abelits@...vell.com>
Cc: "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prasun Kapoor <pkapoor@...vell.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] task_isolation: kick_all_cpus_sync: don't kick
isolated cpus
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:15:24PM +0000, Alex Belits wrote:
> From: Yuri Norov <ynorov@...vell.com>
>
> Make sure that kick_all_cpus_sync() does not call CPUs that are running
> isolated tasks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Belits <abelits@...vell.com>
> ---
> kernel/smp.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 3a8bcbdd4ce6..d9b4b2fedfed 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -731,9 +731,21 @@ static void do_nothing(void *unused)
> */
> void kick_all_cpus_sync(void)
> {
> + struct cpumask mask;
> +
> /* Make sure the change is visible before we kick the cpus */
> smp_mb();
> - smp_call_function(do_nothing, NULL, 1);
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_ISOLATION
> + cpumask_clear(&mask);
> + task_isolation_cpumask(&mask);
> + cpumask_complement(&mask, &mask);
> +#else
> + cpumask_setall(&mask);
> +#endif
> + smp_call_function_many(&mask, do_nothing, NULL, 1);
> + preempt_enable();
> }
That looks very dangerous, the callers of kick_all_cpus_sync() want to
sync all CPUs for a reason. You will rather need to fix the callers.
Thanks.
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kick_all_cpus_sync);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists