[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200307144506.7585f0f5@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:45:06 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: sameo@...ux.intel.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
johannes@...solutions.net
Subject: Re: linux-next: the nfc-next tree seems to be old
Hi all,
On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 18:08:23 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:48:25 +1100
>
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:55:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Samuel,
> >>
> >> I noticed that the nfc-next tree has not changed since June 2018 and
> >> has been orphaned in May 2019, so am wondering if the commits in it are
> >> still relevant or should I just remove the tree from linux-next.
> >
> > Since I have had no response, I will remove it tomorrow.
>
> We've been integrating NFC patches directly into my networking tree for
> a while now, so this is indeed the thing to do.
I have removed it now.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists