[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200307060808.6nfyqnp2woq7d3cv@kili.mountain>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 09:08:08 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: "Tigran A. Aivazian" <aivazian.tigran@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bfs: prevent underflow in bfs_find_entry()
We check if "namelen" is larger than BFS_NAMELEN but we don't check
if it's less than zero so it causes a static checker.
fs/bfs/dir.c:346 bfs_find_entry() warn: no lower bound on 'namelen'
It's nicer to make it unsigned anyway.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
fs/bfs/dir.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/bfs/dir.c b/fs/bfs/dir.c
index d8dfe3a0cb39..46a2663e5eb2 100644
--- a/fs/bfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/bfs/dir.c
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static struct buffer_head *bfs_find_entry(struct inode *dir,
struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
struct bfs_dirent *de;
const unsigned char *name = child->name;
- int namelen = child->len;
+ unsigned int namelen = child->len;
*res_dir = NULL;
if (namelen > BFS_NAMELEN)
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists