[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8150bc6c-f6a4-fa2c-4e2e-552dcb168df0@xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 10:32:42 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 10/11] videobuf2: add begin/end cpu_access callbacks to
dma-sg
On 07/03/2020 06:26, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/03/06 15:04), Hans Verkuil wrote:
> [..]
>>> + /*
>>> + * NOTE: dma-sg allocates memory using the page allocator directly, so
>>> + * there is no memory consistency guarantee, hence dma-sg ignores DMA
>>> + * attributes passed from the upper layer. That means that
>>> + * V4L2_FLAG_MEMORY_NON_CONSISTENT has no effect on dma-sg buffers.
>>> + */
>>> buf->pages = kvmalloc_array(buf->num_pages, sizeof(struct page *),
>>> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
>>> if (!buf->pages)
>>> @@ -470,6 +476,26 @@ static void vb2_dma_sg_dmabuf_ops_release(struct dma_buf *dbuf)
>>> vb2_dma_sg_put(dbuf->priv);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int vb2_dma_sg_dmabuf_ops_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dbuf,
>>> + enum dma_data_direction direction)
>>
>> I suggest you use this style to avoid checkpatch warnings:
>>
>> static int
>> vb2_dma_sg_dmabuf_ops_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dbuf,
>> enum dma_data_direction direction)
>
> OK, will do.
>
> Just for information, my checkpatch doesn't warn me:
>
> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl outgoing/0010-videobuf2-add-begin-end-cpu_access-callbacks-to-dma-.patch
We use the --strict option to checkpatch.
Regards,
Hans
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 46 lines checked
>
> outgoing/0010-videobuf2-add-begin-end-cpu_access-callbacks-to-dma-.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
>
> -ss
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists