lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 18:46:34 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org> To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/11] videobuf2: add cache management members On (20/03/06 14:57), Hans Verkuil wrote: [..] > > * @lock: pointer to a mutex that protects the &struct vb2_queue. The > > * driver can set this to a mutex to let the v4l2 core serialize > > * the queuing ioctls. If the driver wants to handle locking > > @@ -564,6 +573,7 @@ struct vb2_queue { > > unsigned requires_requests:1; > > unsigned uses_qbuf:1; > > unsigned uses_requests:1; > > + unsigned allow_cache_hints:1; Shall I use "unsigned int" here instead of "unsigned"? -ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists