[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200307094634.GB29464@google.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 18:46:34 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/11] videobuf2: add cache management members
On (20/03/06 14:57), Hans Verkuil wrote:
[..]
> > * @lock: pointer to a mutex that protects the &struct vb2_queue. The
> > * driver can set this to a mutex to let the v4l2 core serialize
> > * the queuing ioctls. If the driver wants to handle locking
> > @@ -564,6 +573,7 @@ struct vb2_queue {
> > unsigned requires_requests:1;
> > unsigned uses_qbuf:1;
> > unsigned uses_requests:1;
> > + unsigned allow_cache_hints:1;
Shall I use "unsigned int" here instead of "unsigned"?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists