[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200308195618.22768-2-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Date:   Sun,  8 Mar 2020 20:56:16 +0100
From:   Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
To:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] docs: atomic_ops: Remove colons where they don't make sense
There are a few cases on atomic_ops.rst, where a end-of-line colon
before a code block seems semantically wrong, because the code block is
not related to the sentence before it.
End those lines with `. ::` instead, which is rendered as a period but
still formats the next line/block as a code block.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
---
 Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
index 724583453e1f..650b9693469a 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
@@ -242,13 +242,13 @@ given atomic counter.  They return a boolean indicating whether the
 resulting counter value was zero or not.
 Again, these primitives provide explicit memory barrier semantics around
-the atomic operation::
+the atomic operation. ::
 	int atomic_sub_and_test(int i, atomic_t *v);
 This is identical to atomic_dec_and_test() except that an explicit
 decrement is given instead of the implicit "1".  This primitive must
-provide explicit memory barrier semantics around the operation::
+provide explicit memory barrier semantics around the operation. ::
 	int atomic_add_negative(int i, atomic_t *v);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
