[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200308212649.GA31247@amd>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 22:26:49 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Tobias Schramm <t.schramm@...jaro.org>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Add generic inverted led triggers
Hi!
> This patch adds generic inverted LED triggers. With this patch applied
> any trigger can be used with inverted brightness levels by appending
> "-inverted" to the name of a trigger.
Not a big fan (sorry).
We have already _way_ too many triggers, we don't want to have twice
that much.
> This is can be useful for devices that do not have dedicated LEDs for e.g.
> disk activity indication. With this patch applied the power led can be set
> to default-state = on and trigger = disk-activity-inverted. Then the led
> will be on by default, indicating the power state of the device but it
> will turn off briefly whenever there is disk activity.
Better implementation might be to have a trigger attribute doing the
inverting.
> I think dual-use of LEDs might come in handy for quite a few devices since
> a lot of embedded boards and upcoming ARM based notebooks do only have one
> or two LEDs.
Inverting really does not work with all the triggers; numlock-inverted
will not get too many
users. always-on-inverted... blink-inverted.... I guess it does make
sense for disk activity (but be warned disk can be continuously active
for quite a while).
What triggers do you think make sense inverted?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists