[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b4615be96008d1031efd3ed309437c05d564019.camel@marvell.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 03:53:35 +0000
From: Alex Belits <abelits@...vell.com>
To: "frederic@...nel.org" <frederic@...nel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prasun Kapoor <pkapoor@...vell.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/12] task_isolation: don't interrupt CPUs with
tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu()
From: Yuri Norov <ynorov@...vell.com>
For nohz_full CPUs the desirable behavior is to receive interrupts
generated by tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(). But for hard isolation it's
obviously not desirable because it breaks isolation.
This patch adds check for it.
Signed-off-by: Yuri Norov <ynorov@...vell.com>
[abelits@...vell.com: updated, only exclude CPUs running isolated tasks]
Signed-off-by: Alex Belits <abelits@...vell.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 1d4dec9d3ee7..fe4503ba1316 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
#include <linux/sched/stat.h>
#include <linux/sched/nohz.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/irq_work.h>
#include <linux/posix-timers.h>
@@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_full_kick(void)
*/
void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu)
{
- if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu) || task_isolation_on_cpu(cpu))
return;
irq_work_queue_on(&per_cpu(nohz_full_kick_work, cpu), cpu);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists