[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200308222609.125574449@linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 23:24:01 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Subject: [patch part-II V2 02/13] x86/entry: Mark enter_from_user_mode() notrace and NOKPROBE
Both the callers in the low level ASM code and __context_tracking_exit()
which is invoked from enter_from_user_mode() via user_exit_irqoff() are
marked NOKPROBE. Allowing enter_from_user_mode() to be probed is
inconsistent at best.
Aside of that while function tracing per se is safe the function trace
entry/exit points can be used via BPF as well which is not safe to use
before context tracking has reached CONTEXT_KERNEL and adjusted RCU.
Mark it notrace and NOKROBE.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/entry/common.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
@@ -40,11 +40,12 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING
/* Called on entry from user mode with IRQs off. */
-__visible inline void enter_from_user_mode(void)
+__visible inline notrace void enter_from_user_mode(void)
{
CT_WARN_ON(ct_state() != CONTEXT_USER);
user_exit_irqoff();
}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(enter_from_user_mode);
#else
static inline void enter_from_user_mode(void) {}
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists