linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fsl: dpio: remove set but not used variable 'addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADRPPNTb2_-0QpD=iuP-W-Tk6n-a3rHKp-M38xw5kf+BXXrbPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:33:49 -0500
From:   Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Youri Querry <youri.querry_1@....com>
Cc:     Roy Pledge <Roy.Pledge@....com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fsl: dpio: remove set but not used variable 'addr_cena'

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:38 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> commit 3b2abda7d28c ("soc: fsl: dpio: Replace QMAN array
> mode with ring mode enqueue") introduced this, but not
> used, so remove it.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> index 740ee0d..350de56 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> @@ -658,7 +658,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
>         const uint32_t *cl = (uint32_t *)d;
>         uint32_t eqcr_ci, eqcr_pi, half_mask, full_mask;
>         int i, num_enqueued = 0;
> -       uint64_t addr_cena;
>
>         spin_lock(&s->access_spinlock);
>         half_mask = (s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask>>1);
> @@ -711,7 +710,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
>
>         /* Flush all the cacheline without load/store in between */
>         eqcr_pi = s->eqcr.pi;
> -       addr_cena = (size_t)s->addr_cena;
>         for (i = 0; i < num_enqueued; i++)
>                 eqcr_pi++;
>         s->eqcr.pi = eqcr_pi & full_mask;
> @@ -822,7 +820,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
>         const uint32_t *cl;
>         uint32_t eqcr_ci, eqcr_pi, half_mask, full_mask;
>         int i, num_enqueued = 0;
> -       uint64_t addr_cena;
>
>         half_mask = (s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask>>1);
>         full_mask = s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask;
> @@ -866,7 +863,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
>
>         /* Flush all the cacheline without load/store in between */
>         eqcr_pi = s->eqcr.pi;
> -       addr_cena = (uint64_t)s->addr_cena;

Hi Youri,

Looks like this problem exposed another issue that you removed the
cacheline related code in the upstream version.  Then the comment /*
Flush all the cacheline without load/store in between */ is no longer
true now, and probably the whole block can be replaced with a single
line to increase s->eqcr.pi?   The same for the block above.  Can you
provide a better fix for this issue?

Regards,
Leo

>         for (i = 0; i < num_enqueued; i++)
>                 eqcr_pi++;
>         s->eqcr.pi = eqcr_pi & full_mask;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>