[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200309090650.GF12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:06:50 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] docs: a few improvements for atomic_ops.rst
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 08:56:15PM +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a short series of unrelated fixes that make the atomic
> operations documentation look and read a bit better.
>
> Jonathan Neuschäfer (3):
> docs: atomic_ops: Remove colons where they don't make sense
> docs: atomic_ops: Move two paragraphs into the warning block above
> docs: atomic_ops: Steer readers towards using refcount_t for reference
> counts
>
> Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst | 24 ++++++++++++-------
FWIW, I consider this a dead document. I've written
Documentation/atomic_t.txt and Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt as a
replacement. If there is anything in atomic_ops you feel is missing from
those two, please tell as I'm planing to delete atomic_ops soon.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists