linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 01/11] videobuf2: add cache management members

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAFQd5BH2rFZkABej+JfW76f2tjmBBKWm8WjW+TOTBjfewm_9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Mar 2020 18:17:43 +0900
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/11] videobuf2: add cache management members

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 6:08 PM Sergey Senozhatsky
<senozhatsky@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On (20/03/09 17:58), Tomasz Figa wrote:
> [..]
> > > > I see. Hmm, how do I do "test that V4L2_BUF_CAP_SUPPORTS_CACHE_HINTS
> > > > is never set" then?
> > >
> > > Not sure I understand your question. When requesting buffers for non-MMAP memory,
> > > this capability must never be returned. That has nothing to do with a cache_hints
> > > module option.
> >
> > Have we decided that we explicitly don't want to support this for
> > USERPTR memory, even though technically possible and without much
> > extra code needed?
>
> My irrelevant 5 cents (sorry), I'd probably prefer to land MMAP
> first + test drivers patches + v4l-util patches. The effort
> required to land this is getting bigger.

I think that's fine, but we need to make it explicit. :)

Best regards,
Tomasz