[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200309105219.GC25261@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:52:20 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: luanshi <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: arm_spe: remove unnecessary zero check
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:25:06PM +0800, luanshi wrote:
> The "nr_pages" variable has been checked before, it can't be zero, so a check here would be useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
As the commit message states, a done:
| /* We need at least two pages for this to work. */
| if (nr_pages < 2)
| return NULL;
... so this looks sensible to me:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Mark.
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index 4e4984a..b72c048 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static void *arm_spe_pmu_setup_aux(struct perf_event *event, void **pages,
> * parts and give userspace a fighting chance of getting some
> * useful data out of it.
> */
> - if (!nr_pages || (snapshot && (nr_pages & 1)))
> + if (snapshot && (nr_pages & 1))
> return NULL;
>
> if (cpu == -1)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists