lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200309134104.GE27711@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date:   Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:41:04 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, osalvador@...e.de, rppt@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] mm/sparse.c: move subsection_map related codes
 together

On 03/09/20 at 10:08am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 07.03.20 09:42, Baoquan He wrote:
> > No functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/sparse.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
 
> 
> IMHO, we don't need this patch - but just my personal opinion. Change
> itself looks good on a quick glance.

I personally like seeing function set operating on one data structure
being put together. To me, I use vi+ctags+cscope to jump to called
funtion easily. When try to get a picture of a data and handling, e.g here
the subsection map and the relevant functions, putting them together is
better to understand code. I am also fine to discard this patch, no
patch has dependency on this one in this series, it's easy to not pick
it if no one like it. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ