[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR03MB517071B8C4BC78358E896147E4FE0@AM6PR03MB5170.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:58:17 +0000
From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Christian Kellner <christian@...lner.me>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Infrastructure to allow fixing exec deadlocks
On 3/8/20 10:34 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Bernd, everyone
>
> This is how I think the infrastructure change should look that makes way
> for fixing this issue.
>
> - Cleanup and reorder the code so code that can potentially wait
> indefinitely for userspace comes at the beginning for flush_old_exec.
> - Add a new mutex and take it after we have passed any potential
> indefinite waits for userspace.
>
> Then I think it is just going through the existing users of
> cred_guard_mutex and fixing them to use the new one.
>
> There really aren't that many users of cred_guard_mutex so we should be
> able to get through the easy ones fairly quickly. And anything that
> isn't easy we can wait until we have a good fix.
>
> The users of cred_guard_mutex that I saw were:
> fs/proc/base.c:
> proc_pid_attr_write
> do_io_accounting
> proc_pid_stack
> proc_pid_syscall
> proc_pid_personality
>
> perf_event_open
> mm_access
> kcmp
> pidfd_fget
> seccomp_set_mode_filter
>
> Bernd I think I have addressed the issues you pointed out in v1.
> Please let me know if you see anything else.
>
Yes, looks good, except some nits.
Thanks
Bernd.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists