[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200309153325.GJ1454533@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 08:33:25 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: clear 1G pages with streaming stores on x86
> > Tested:
> > Time to `mlock()` a 512GiB region on broadwell CPU
> > AVG time (s) % imp. ms/page
> > clear_page_erms 133.584 - 261
> > clear_page_nt 34.154 74.43% 67
>
> Some macrobenchmark would be great too.
Yes especially something that actually uses the memory. I suspect you'll need
something like the below
> That patchset is somewhat more complex trying to keep the memory around
> the fault address hot in cache. In theory it should help to reduce latency
> on the first access to the memory.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists