[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200309155722.GA32023@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:57:22 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
Cc: cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH][next] dlm: user: Replace zero-length array with
flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
fs/dlm/user.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/user.c b/fs/dlm/user.c
index 5264bac75115..e5cefa90b1ce 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/user.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/user.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct dlm_lock_params32 {
__u32 bastaddr;
__u32 lksb;
char lvb[DLM_USER_LVB_LEN];
- char name[0];
+ char name[];
};
struct dlm_write_request32 {
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists