| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200309192115.GB1399@xps15>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:21:15 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Clement Leger <cleger@...ray.eu>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>, s-anna <s-anna@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] remoteproc: Use size_t instead of int for
rproc_mem_entry len
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:38:56AM +0100, Clement Leger wrote:
> Now that rproc_da_to_va uses a size_t for length, use a size_t for len field
> of rproc_mem_entry. Function used to create such structures now takes
> a size_t instead of int to allow full size range to be handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger <cleger@...ray.eu>
With the checkpatch warning fixed:
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 14 ++++++++------
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 5ab094fc1b55..4bfaf4a3c4a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -318,8 +318,9 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> struct rproc_vring *rvring = &rvdev->vring[i];
> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc;
> - int ret, size, notifyid;
> + int ret, notifyid;
> struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> + size_t size;
>
> /* actual size of vring (in bytes) */
> size = PAGE_ALIGN(vring_size(rvring->len, rvring->align));
> @@ -746,11 +747,12 @@ static int rproc_alloc_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
> va = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->parent, mem->len, &dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!va) {
> dev_err(dev->parent,
> - "failed to allocate dma memory: len 0x%x\n", mem->len);
> + "failed to allocate dma memory: len 0x%zx\n",
> + mem->len);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - dev_dbg(dev, "carveout va %pK, dma %pad, len 0x%x\n",
> + dev_dbg(dev, "carveout va %pK, dma %pad, len 0x%zx\n",
> va, &dma, mem->len);
>
> if (mem->da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY && !rproc->domain) {
> @@ -957,7 +959,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_add_carveout);
> */
> struct rproc_mem_entry *
> rproc_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev,
> - void *va, dma_addr_t dma, int len, u32 da,
> + void *va, dma_addr_t dma, size_t len, u32 da,
> int (*alloc)(struct rproc *, struct rproc_mem_entry *),
> int (*release)(struct rproc *, struct rproc_mem_entry *),
> const char *name, ...)
> @@ -999,7 +1001,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_mem_entry_init);
> * provided by client.
> */
> struct rproc_mem_entry *
> -rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, int len,
> +rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
> u32 da, const char *name, ...)
> {
> struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> @@ -1270,7 +1272,7 @@ static void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
> unmapped = iommu_unmap(rproc->domain, entry->da, entry->len);
> if (unmapped != entry->len) {
> /* nothing much to do besides complaining */
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to unmap %u/%zu\n", entry->len,
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to unmap %zx/%zu\n", entry->len,
> unmapped);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> index dd93cf04e17f..82dc34b819df 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int rproc_carveouts_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *p)
> seq_printf(seq, "\tVirtual address: %pK\n", carveout->va);
> seq_printf(seq, "\tDMA address: %pad\n", &carveout->dma);
> seq_printf(seq, "\tDevice address: 0x%x\n", carveout->da);
> - seq_printf(seq, "\tLength: 0x%x Bytes\n\n", carveout->len);
> + seq_printf(seq, "\tLength: 0x%zx Bytes\n\n", carveout->len);
> }
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 89215798eaea..bee559330204 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct rproc;
> struct rproc_mem_entry {
> void *va;
> dma_addr_t dma;
> - int len;
> + size_t len;
> u32 da;
> void *priv;
> char name[32];
> @@ -599,13 +599,13 @@ void rproc_add_carveout(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem);
>
> struct rproc_mem_entry *
> rproc_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev,
> - void *va, dma_addr_t dma, int len, u32 da,
> + void *va, dma_addr_t dma, size_t len, u32 da,
> int (*alloc)(struct rproc *, struct rproc_mem_entry *),
> int (*release)(struct rproc *, struct rproc_mem_entry *),
> const char *name, ...);
>
> struct rproc_mem_entry *
> -rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, int len,
> +rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
> u32 da, const char *name, ...);
>
> int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc);
> --
> 2.15.0.276.g89ea799
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists