[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19abedb11fae1b96aa052090e7a0d5bbea416824.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 12:30:07 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xattr: NULL initialize name in simple_xattr_alloc
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:37 -0700, Daniel Xu wrote:
> It's preferable to initialize structs to a deterministic state.
Thanks Daniel.
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
> ---
> fs/xattr.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c
> index 90dd78f0eb27..92b324c265d2 100644
> --- a/fs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/xattr.c
> @@ -821,6 +821,7 @@ struct simple_xattr *simple_xattr_alloc(const void *value, size_t size)
> if (!new_xattr)
> return NULL;
>
> + new_xattr->name = NULL;
> new_xattr->size = size;
> memcpy(new_xattr->value, value, size);
> return new_xattr;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists