linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND v6 1/2] pwm: Convert drivers to use 64-bit period and duty cycle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:41:48 -0700
From:   Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RESEND v6 1/2] pwm: Convert drivers to use 64-bit period and
 duty cycle

Hi Uwe,

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:56:59AM -0800, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 08:44:40AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > I guess we need acks from the affected maintainers. While I think the
> > changes are fine I think you won't evade having to expand the audience
> > of your patch and (depending on feedback) maybe split this patch up
> > further.
> 
> Sure. I'll split up this patch into one per file and add the respective
> maintainers for ease of reviewing.

I used the get_maintainer.pl script to add the respective maintainers of
the files. Could you please provide feedback on whether v7 what you had
in mind in your comment above?

Thank you.

Guru Das.