[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2003101301280.19500@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:22:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Filipe Laíns <lains@...hlinux.org>
cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@...itech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: logitech-dj: add support for the static device in
the Powerplay mat/receiver
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> > > + /* custom receiver device (eg. powerplay) */
> > > + if (hidpp_report->device_index == 7) {
> > > + workitem.reports_supported |= HIDPP;
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > I guess we can't do anything else than to trust Logitech that they will
> > not assign conflicting device_index ID in the future to something that
> > will not be HID++, right?
> >
> > Or is this properly documented somewhere?
> >
> > Thanks,
>
>
> CCing Nestor
>
> Yes, we need to trust Logitech on this. There's isn't anything
> documented regarding this AFAIK.
>
> Even if Logitech released a device with index 7 that didn't support
> HID++, it wouldn't be that big of an issue. We would just end up with a
> hidraw node which would export a vendor page report descriptor but the
> device wouldn't actually reply to anything.
Given the silence from Nestor, I guess we can just apply this for 5.7;
pushing to for-5.7/logitech branch.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists