[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200310143527.GB3376131@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:35:27 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Holger Hoffstätte
<holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/168] 5.4.25-stable review
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 03:02:37PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 3/10/20 1:37 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.25 release.
>
> This fails to compile due to broken patch 001/168:
> "block, bfq: get a ref to a group when adding it to a service tree":
>
> ..
> block/bfq-wf2q.c: In function 'bfq_get_entity':
> ./include/linux/kernel.h:994:51: error: 'struct bfq_group' has no member named 'entity'
> ..
>
> The calls to bfq_get_entity::bfqg_and_blkg_get and bfq_forget_entity::bfqg_and_blkg_put
> in bfq-wf2q.c need to be wrapped in #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED, otherwise
> the build will fail when CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is not enabled.
> This horribly error-prone #ifdef mess was finally removed in upstream commit
> 4d8340d0d4d9. For 5.4 we'll either need that as well or add them back.
Ick, that's a mess.
I'll go drop that patch now, odd that it passed my build tests...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists