[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200310154749.GZ2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:47:49 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: 'Marco Elver' <elver@...gle.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] list: Prevent compiler reloads inside 'safe' list
iteration
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 03:05:57PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Marco Elver
> > Sent: 10 March 2020 14:10
> ...
> > FWIW, for writes we're already being quite generous, in that plain
> > aligned writes up to word-size are assumed to be "atomic" with the
> > default (conservative) config, i.e. marking such writes is optional.
> > Although, that's a generous assumption that is not always guaranteed
> > to hold (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190821103200.kpufwtviqhpbuv2n@willie-the-truck/).
>
> Remind me to start writing everything in assembler.
Been there, done that. :-/
> That and to mark all structure members 'volatile'.
Indeed. READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() get this same effect, but without
pessimizing non-concurrent accesses to those same members. Plus KCSAN
knows about READ_ONCE(), WRITE_ONCE(), and also volatile members.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists