[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB44813CDE69F5421F9708670A88FF0@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:19:52 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
CC: "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 07/14] clk: imx7ulp: make it easy to change ARM core
clk
Hi Shawn,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] clk: imx7ulp: make it easy to change ARM core
> clk
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:59:50PM +0800, peng.fan@....com wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > ARM clk could only source from divcore or hsrun_divcore.
> >
> > However when ARM core is running normaly, whether divcore or
> > hwrun_divcore will finally source from SPLL_PFD0. However SPLL_PFD0 is
> > marked with CLK_SET_GATE, so we need to disable SPLL_PFD0, when
> > configure the rate. So add CORE and HSRUN_CORE virtual clk to make it
> > easy to configure the clk using imx_clk_hw_cpu API.
>
> It sounds a bit hackish, so would like to hear an ACK from Stephen on it.
Same to i.MX7/8M SoCs, the cpu clk could not change on the fly,
That's why we use a imx_clk_hw_cpu for i.MX7/8M cpu clock.
To i.MX7ULP, it is a bit different, cpu could sources from two clocks
based on a SMC setting which is abstract as a mux in clk-imx7ulp.c.
However we still could not change HSRUN_CORE or CORE clk
on the fly whether the cpu sources form HSRUN_CORE or CORE clk.
That's why I add virtual clk for HSRUN and CORE, same as i.MX7/8M.
Stephen rejected my original patch to use a virtual clk for the final
output which add imx_hw_clk_cpuv2,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11364633/
So I implement the method in this patch which is cleaner and
simple. With this approach, it is easy to reuse cpufreq-dt driver,
we no need a new clk driver and no need a new cpufreq driver
for i.MX7ULP.
Please consider this patch.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> Shawn
>
> >
> > Since CORE and HSRUN_CORE already marked with CLK_IS_CRITICAL, no
> need
> > to set ARM as CLK_IS_CRITICAL. And when set the rate of ARM clk,
> > prograting it the parent with CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT will finally set the
> > SPLL_PFD0 clk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7ulp.c | 6 ++++--
> > include/dt-bindings/clock/imx7ulp-clock.h | 5 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7ulp.c
> > b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7ulp.c index 3710aa0dee9b..634c0b6636b0
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7ulp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7ulp.c
> > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static const char * const ddr_sels[] =
> { "apll_pfd_sel", "dummy", "dummy", "dum
> > static const char * const nic_sels[] = { "firc", "ddr_clk", };
> > static const char * const periph_plat_sels[] = { "dummy", "nic1_bus_clk",
> "nic1_clk", "ddr_clk", "apll_pfd2", "apll_pfd1", "apll_pfd0", "upll", };
> > static const char * const periph_bus_sels[] = { "dummy", "sosc_bus_clk",
> "dummy", "firc_bus_clk", "rosc", "nic1_bus_clk", "nic1_clk", "spll_bus_clk", };
> > -static const char * const arm_sels[] = { "divcore", "dummy", "dummy",
> "hsrun_divcore", };
> > +static const char * const arm_sels[] = { "core", "dummy", "dummy",
> "hsrun_core", };
> >
> > /* used by sosc/sirc/firc/ddr/spll/apll dividers */ static const
> > struct clk_div_table ulp_div_table[] = { @@ -121,7 +121,9 @@ static
> > void __init imx7ulp_clk_scg1_init(struct device_node *np)
> > hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_DDR_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("ddr_sel",
> base + 0x30, 24, 2, ddr_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ddr_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
> CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE);
> >
> > hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_CORE_DIV] = imx_clk_hw_divider_flags("divcore",
> "scs_sel", base + 0x14, 16, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> > + hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_CORE] = imx_clk_hw_cpu("core", "divcore",
> hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_CORE_DIV]->clk, hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_SYS_SEL]->clk,
> hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_SPLL_SEL]->clk, hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_FIRC]->clk);
> > hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_HSRUN_CORE_DIV] =
> > imx_clk_hw_divider_flags("hsrun_divcore", "hsrun_scs_sel", base +
> > 0x1c, 16, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> > + hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_HSRUN_CORE] = imx_clk_hw_cpu("hsrun_core",
> > +"hsrun_divcore", hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_HSRUN_CORE_DIV]->clk,
> > +hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_HSRUN_SYS_SEL]->clk,
> hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_SPLL_SEL]->clk,
> > +hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_FIRC]->clk);
> >
> > hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_DDR_DIV] = imx_clk_hw_divider_gate("ddr_clk",
> "ddr_sel", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, base + 0x30, 0, 3,
> > 0, ulp_div_table, &imx_ccm_lock);
> @@ -270,7 +272,7 @@
> > static void __init imx7ulp_clk_smc1_init(struct device_node *np)
> > base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > WARN_ON(!base);
> >
> > - hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_ARM] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("arm", base + 0x10,
> 8, 2, arm_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(arm_sels), CLK_IS_CRITICAL);
> > + hws[IMX7ULP_CLK_ARM] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("arm", base + 0x10,
> 8,
> > +2, arm_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(arm_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> >
> > imx_check_clk_hws(hws, clk_data->num);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx7ulp-clock.h
> > b/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx7ulp-clock.h
> > index 38145bdcd975..b58370d146e2 100644
> > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx7ulp-clock.h
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx7ulp-clock.h
> > @@ -58,7 +58,10 @@
> > #define IMX7ULP_CLK_HSRUN_SYS_SEL 44
> > #define IMX7ULP_CLK_HSRUN_CORE_DIV 45
> >
> > -#define IMX7ULP_CLK_SCG1_END 46
> > +#define IMX7ULP_CLK_CORE 46
> > +#define IMX7ULP_CLK_HSRUN_CORE 47
> > +
> > +#define IMX7ULP_CLK_SCG1_END 48
> >
> > /* PCC2 */
> > #define IMX7ULP_CLK_DMA1 0
> > --
> > 2.16.4
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists