[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200310181242.GA31738@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:12:42 -0700
From: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/13] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division macros
for period and duty cycle
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:34:32PM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> This patch looks like it is a tiny change to get the pwm_backlight to
> perform 64-bit division. Most of the above text is completely irrelevant
> to the change contained in this patch. No need to justify the change in
> the PWM structures here since that can go in the patch that changes
> those structures. Just describe what this patch does, perhaps something
> like the following:
>
> The PWM API will shortly switch the state.period and
> state.duty_cycle fields to 64-bit values. Make pwm_bl
> ready for this transition by adopting 64-bit division
> macros.
Will update the commit text accordingly.
> Also please copy the backlight maintainers into the covering letter. It
> is useful to place patches like this into context.
Will do.
Thank you.
Guru Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists