linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Better document the softlockup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHD1Q_w26XP5fOcqW_toDLvEU0crt1dUUjiwCyWTn_U1-Nh=1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:20:15 -0300
From:   Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@...onical.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        swood@...hat.com, mcgrof@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        yzaikin@...gle.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <kernel@...ccoli.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Better document the softlockup_panic sysctl

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:05 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> So this doesn't even come close to applying; could you respin it against
> docs-next, please?

Sure, will resubmit soon. I understand docs-next is just linux-next
correct? I couldn't find any specific docs tree on kernel.org ...


>
> ..and while you're at it, make it "*the* kernel.softlockup_panic sysctl" :)


Sure! Thanks for the review,


Guilherme