lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200310183243.GA14549@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:32:43 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        hare@...e.de, ming.lei@...hat.com, bvanassche@....org,
        hch@...radead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        esc.storagedev@...rosemi.com, chenxiang66@...ilicon.com,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/24] scsi: allocate separate queue for reserved
 commands

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:25:28AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
> 
> Allocate a separate 'reserved_cmd_q' for sending reserved commands.

Why?  Reserved command specifically are not in any way tied to queues.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ