| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200310184921.23552-5-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:49:21 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] irqchip/gic-v4: Provide irq_retrigger to avoid circular locking dependency
On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the
following lockdep splat:
[ 6022.598864] ======================================================
[ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 #680 Tainted: G E
[ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0
[ 6022.637102]
[ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock:
[ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98
[ 6022.651350]
[ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 6022.651350]
[ 6022.659512]
[ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 6022.666980]
[ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}:
[ 6022.672983] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78
[ 6022.677848] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98
[ 6022.682453] irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0
[ 6022.687236] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8
[ 6022.692364] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70
[ 6022.696273] vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8
[ 6022.700183] kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48
[ 6022.704182] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50
[ 6022.708614] kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50
[ 6022.712700] __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8
[ 6022.716697] schedule+0x50/0xd8
[ 6022.720347] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978
[ 6022.725473] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8
[ 6022.729820] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
[ 6022.733642] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.738074] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8
[ 6022.743373] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88
[ 6022.747198] el0_svc+0x14/0x40
[ 6022.750761] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8
[ 6022.755278] el0_sync+0x140/0x180
[ 6022.759100]
[ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
[ 6022.764143] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
[ 6022.768314] task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128
[ 6022.772572] sched_fork+0xe0/0x210
[ 6022.776484] copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8
[ 6022.780742] _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8
[ 6022.784478] kernel_thread+0x64/0x88
[ 6022.788563] rest_init+0x30/0x270
[ 6022.792390] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c
[ 6022.796995] start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4
[ 6022.801164]
[ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}:
[ 6022.806382] __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8
[ 6022.810813] lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218
[ 6022.814896] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78
[ 6022.819761] try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0
[ 6022.824018] wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28
[ 6022.828276] wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40
[ 6022.832533] __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0
[ 6022.837658] __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.842176] check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158
[ 6022.846609] irq_startup+0x74/0x128
[ 6022.850606] __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78
[ 6022.854602] enable_irq+0x54/0xa0
[ 6022.858431] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8
[ 6022.863557] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70
[ 6022.867469] kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38
[ 6022.872336] kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490
[ 6022.876594] kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310
[ 6022.880938] handle_exit+0x138/0x198
[ 6022.885022] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978
[ 6022.890148] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8
[ 6022.894494] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
[ 6022.898317] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.902748] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8
[ 6022.908046] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88
[ 6022.911871] el0_svc+0x14/0x40
[ 6022.915434] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8
[ 6022.919951] el0_sync+0x140/0x180
[ 6022.923773]
[ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 6022.923773]
[ 6022.931762] Chain exists of:
[ 6022.931762] &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class
[ 6022.931762]
[ 6022.942101] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 6022.942101]
[ 6022.948007] CPU0 CPU1
[ 6022.952523] ---- ----
[ 6022.957039] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
[ 6022.961036] lock(&rq->lock);
[ 6022.966595] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
[ 6022.973109] lock(&p->pi_lock);
[ 6022.976324]
[ 6022.976324] *** DEADLOCK ***
This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires
retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the
circular dependency above.
The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't
require acquiring any extra lock.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 83b1186ffcad..fd0758a29b5f 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -3675,12 +3675,18 @@ static int its_vpe_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
return 0;
}
+static int its_vpe_retrigger(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ return !its_vpe_set_irqchip_state(d, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, true);
+}
+
static struct irq_chip its_vpe_irq_chip = {
.name = "GICv4-vpe",
.irq_mask = its_vpe_mask_irq,
.irq_unmask = its_vpe_unmask_irq,
.irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
.irq_set_affinity = its_vpe_set_affinity,
+ .irq_retrigger = its_vpe_retrigger,
.irq_set_irqchip_state = its_vpe_set_irqchip_state,
.irq_set_vcpu_affinity = its_vpe_set_vcpu_affinity,
};
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists