lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200310195425.GA23440@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:54:25 +0100
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] dt-bindings: display: Add idk-2121wr binding

Hi Prabhakar

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:39:29PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> From: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
> 
> Add binding for the idk-2121wr LVDS panel from Advantech.
> 
> Some panel-specific documentation can be found here:
> https://buy.advantech.eu/Displays/Embedded-LCD-Kits-High-Brightness/model-IDK-2121WR-K2FHA2E.htm
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi All,
> This patch is part of series [1] ("Add dual-LVDS panel support to EK874),
> all the patches have been accepted from it except this one. I have fixed
> Rob's comments in this version of the patch.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11297589/
> 
> V7->8
>  * Dropped ref to lvds.yaml, since the panel a dual channel LVDS, as a
>    result the root port is called as ports instead of port and the child
>    node port@0 and port@1 are used for even and odd pixels, hence binding
>    has required property as ports instead of port.

Looks good, thanks for your persistence..
Applied and pushed to drm-misc-next.

	Sam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ