linux-kernel - Re: [patch part-II V2 08/13] tracing: Provide lockdep less trace_hardirqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200310110802.GC29372@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:08:02 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch part-II V2 08/13] tracing: Provide lockdep less
 trace_hardirqs_on/off() variants

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:55:57AM +0100, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
> Shouldn't trace_hardirqs_on() be updated to call __trace_hardirqs_on()? It's the same
> code except for the lockdep call.

Fell into that one too initially. Look again. :)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette