[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200310111503.GF3794@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:15:03 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: ashok.raj@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
Derrick Jonathan <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Replace private domain with per-group default
Hi Baolu,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 02:20:08PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Lu Baolu (5):
> iommu: Configure default domain with dev_def_domain_type
> iommu/vt-d: Don't force 32bit devices to uses DMA domain
> iommu/vt-d: Don't force PCI sub-hierarchy to use DMA domain
> iommu/vt-d: Add dev_def_domain_type callback
> iommu/vt-d: Apply per-device dma_ops
>
> Sai Praneeth Prakhya (1):
> iommu: Add dev_def_domain_type() callback in iommu_ops
I like this patch-set, but I fear some regressions from patch
"iommu/vt-d: Don't force 32bit devices to uses DMA domain". Have you
tested this series on a couple of machines, ideally even older ones from
the first generation of VT-d hardware?
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists