[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200310123650.795161928@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:39:57 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 151/168] regulator: stm32-vrefbuf: fix a possible overshoot when re-enabling
From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
commit 02fbabd5f4ed182d2c616e49309f5a3efd9ec671 upstream.
There maybe an overshoot, when disabling, then re-enabling vrefbuf
too quickly. VREFBUF is used by ADC/DAC on some boards. When re-enabling
too quickly, an overshoot on the reference voltage make the conversions
inaccurate for a short period of time.
- Don't put the VREFBUF in HiZ when disabling, to force an active
discharge.
- Enforce a 1ms OFF/ON delay
Fixes: 0cdbf481e927 ("regulator: Add support for stm32-vrefbuf")
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Message-Id: <1583312132-20932-1-git-send-email-fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/regulator/stm32-vrefbuf.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/regulator/stm32-vrefbuf.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/stm32-vrefbuf.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int stm32_vrefbuf_disable(struct
}
val = readl_relaxed(priv->base + STM32_VREFBUF_CSR);
- val = (val & ~STM32_ENVR) | STM32_HIZ;
+ val &= ~STM32_ENVR;
writel_relaxed(val, priv->base + STM32_VREFBUF_CSR);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(priv->dev);
@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ static const struct regulator_desc stm32
.volt_table = stm32_vrefbuf_voltages,
.n_voltages = ARRAY_SIZE(stm32_vrefbuf_voltages),
.ops = &stm32_vrefbuf_volt_ops,
+ .off_on_delay = 1000,
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists