linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.5 184/189] EDAC/synopsys: Do not print an error with back-to-back snprintf() calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:40:21 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Manish Narani <manish.narani@...inx.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.5 184/189] EDAC/synopsys: Do not print an error with back-to-back snprintf() calls

From: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>

commit dfc6014e3b60713f375d0601d7549eed224c4615 upstream.

handle_error() currently calls snprintf() a couple of times in
succession to output the message for a CE/UE, therefore overwriting each
part of the message which was formatted with the previous snprintf()
call. As a result, only the part of the message from the last snprintf()
call will be printed.

The simplest and most effective way to fix this problem is to combine
the whole string into one which to supply to a single snprintf() call.

 [ bp: Massage. ]

Fixes: b500b4a029d57 ("EDAC, synopsys: Add ECC support for ZynqMP DDR controller")
Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: Manish Narani <manish.narani@...inx.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1582792452-32575-1-git-send-email-sherry.sun@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c |   22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
@@ -479,20 +479,14 @@ static void handle_error(struct mem_ctl_
 		pinf = &p->ceinfo;
 		if (!priv->p_data->quirks) {
 			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d ",
-				  "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
-			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x\n",
+				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x",
+				 "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
 				 pinf->bitpos, pinf->data);
 		} else {
 			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d ",
-				  "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
-			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d ",
-				 pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr);
-			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x\n",
+				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x",
+				 "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
+				 pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr,
 				 pinf->bitpos, pinf->data);
 		}
 
@@ -509,10 +503,8 @@ static void handle_error(struct mem_ctl_
 				"UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
 		} else {
 			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "DDR ECC error type :%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d ",
-				 "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
-			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d",
+				 "DDR ECC error type :%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d",
+				 "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
 				 pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr);
 		}