linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: smp: add support for per-task stack canaries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f99ffbf-d0c0-d98d-f44a-1014bdcb778b@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:39:32 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: smp: add support for per-task stack canaries

On 3/11/20 1:45 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:47:20AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:31:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 3/11/20 10:21 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:32:57AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>>> On ARM, we currently only change the value of the stack canary when
>>>>>> switching tasks if the kernel was built for UP. On SMP kernels, this
>>>>>> is impossible since the stack canary value is obtained via a global
>>>>>> symbol reference, which means
>>>>>> a) all running tasks on all CPUs must use the same value
>>>>>> b) we can only modify the value when no kernel stack frames are live
>>>>>>    on any CPU, which is effectively never.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So instead, use a GCC plugin to add a RTL pass that replaces each
>>>>>> reference to the address of the __stack_chk_guard symbol with an
>>>>>> expression that produces the address of the 'stack_canary' field
>>>>>> that is added to struct thread_info. This way, each task will use
>>>>>> its own randomized value.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
>>>>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>>>> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
>>>>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since this patch is in the tree, cc-option no longer works on
>>>>> the arm architecture if CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK is enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any idea how to fix that ? 
>>>>
>>>> I thought Arnd sent a patch to fix it and it got picked up?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, but the fix is not upstream (it is only in -next), and I missed it.
>>
>> Ah, yes, I found it again now too; it went through rmk's tree.
>>
>> For thread posterity:
>>
>> ARM: 8961/2: Fix Kbuild issue caused by per-task stack protector GCC plugin
>> https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8961/2
> 
> It's in my fixes branch, waiting for me to do my (now usual) push
> of fixes to Linus.
> 
> I'm not sure whether the above discussion is suggesting that there's
> a problem with this patch, or whether it's trying to encourage me
> to send it up to Linus.  I _think_ there's the suggestion that it
> causes a regression, hmm?
> ARM: 8961/2: Fix Kbuild issue caused by per-task stack protector GCC plugin

Commit 189af4657186da08 ("ARM: smp: add support for per-task stack canaries")
caused a regression. "ARM: 8961/2: Fix Kbuild issue caused by per-task stack
protector GCC plugin" fixes it.

Guenter